![]() I've started using with videos a lot lately, > but I like seeing where the guy is playing it which is why I use > strips audio from youtube (google that). To work with youtube videos, I use a website that > From what I understand, a serious player would prefer Transcribe. > probably because of all the additional capability. > didn't know them because the user interface isn't as obvious. > that's because I didn't know the easiest ways to do things - and I > but, the one time I tried it, it seemed more cumbersome. > Apparently, Transcribe will do this (of course) and a great deal more, > intuitive user interface which requires no learning because it's so > it to do it loop things and slow them down. I bought it before I'd ever heard of Transcribe. > On Dec 21, 3:08 pm, rpjazzguitar wrote: Here's a little blog post I wrote on transcribing that somebody will Purchase it (for a modest $49) they give you EVERY upgrade for FREE! It into Transcribe! It's got a TON of other options which I haven'tĪfter transcribing solos for over 30 years, I really can't imagine not There are plenty of ways toĭownload flash video, then all you have to do is convert to mp4 and load And then of course, being able to work from a video is a Of the thing you're transcribing in a very visual way before you startĭiving in and dealing with the notes (makes the whole process moreĮfficient). This allows you to map out the whole form (handy sometimes if you're dealing with odd time and just trying toįigure out how things lay). It lets you to mark sections, measures and even beats Transcribe! is designed in a way that makes Purchased Amazing Slow Downer and used it for a while and it's just not Hands down TRANSCRIBE! is the better product for musicians.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |